This is a really brilliant writeup. So a product can have a broken narrative shield, but for some users (like you and David for now) it's not at the point where you have to make a choice to pivot. What if it makes sense to hold that tension? At some point too for the product, you have to decide if your audience has changed (Breadwinner/Yeast).
The rabbit hole, I found, was so deep. Didn't want to keep stretching, but I just hope the signals driving Substack's trajectory are good, because, with thousands of powers migrating away now (over 5000 from one report for last year alone), it may haunt them.
This is a really brilliant writeup. So a product can have a broken narrative shield, but for some users (like you and David for now) it's not at the point where you have to make a choice to pivot. What if it makes sense to hold that tension? At some point too for the product, you have to decide if your audience has changed (Breadwinner/Yeast).
You get it. Ultimately, we all will do what's best for us.
This is really good. Damn!
The rabbit hole, I found, was so deep. Didn't want to keep stretching, but I just hope the signals driving Substack's trajectory are good, because, with thousands of powers migrating away now (over 5000 from one report for last year alone), it may haunt them.